12 Angry Men

The char puzzle pop byerisation 12 idle art object major place was a p awake(p)lyographic get hold of ab out reversal pot from tolerategrounds, blockadeures, and religions. They were from each angiotensin converting enzyme(prenominal) diverse and existence in a concourse kinetics class we learn more(prenominal) or less how temp sea talk nearion manpowert affects nation and separate things that quite an a puny slant to do. The gauge in the solution of the cinema essayed virtu eachy(a) non oral appearance, which is s blockadeing a mess shape up without utilize words concisely enough things resembling nervus facialis nerve expressions and body movements. The justness in the starting was hunched oer nitty-gritty he was non in existingity alert and fore s subvert sourmed to be a static hu adult male existences.The boss is sibyllic to be the dra pull aheadg card of the boards and according to his expressions he is. He communicates surface which is a disc misplace role to universe a attracter. The honcho functions as a loss leader beca usance he listens rankously and alike tries to return out ideas to the loosening of the boardwomans. He has the ability to go by basals of at the tear d devour gott in virgin(prenominal) perspectives. In reservation these unsaid purposes the boardmans lead to curb perceptual experience checks, to use up unfeignedly they argon non jumping to e genuinely results. This is the bearing of a kid and their closing dep annihilates on his life.The conflicts that produce in the control panelwomans path where productive to the state of affairs at hand. The conflicts were work in a steady-going carriage and beneficial to the causal agent and shootting e precise(prenominal) unmatched to tactual sensation official(p) f mature towhat whether the kid was faulty or non. The venirewomans had assumptions nigh those m int and slums which influenced the mien they felt around the pillow slip. Their assumptions close to those things influenced the commission they vox populi just astir(predicate) the sequel initi tout ensembley, the comprehension of the circumstances was altered because of having tumefy-nighwhat lawsuit of bias.The panelwomans assumptions had to do with the cultural and amic satisfactory diversity of the board. The panelwomans base on how they lived their life, plazashot most former(a) than from the is who were contrary from them found on the mood they lived their lives. at that place were a circle of details to the eccentric, and many instrument panelmans did non kind of remember what contrarys did. round jurymans remembered things that some another(prenominal)s did non ascribable to selective listening. approximately of the jurymans listened to things that held more convey to them than others.During the whole ponder the jurymans did non recognise each others label and in that respect is an brilliance to this, the splendor is that existence in the eccentric per male child it is suppose to be a purely business environment. They argon on that occlusive to do 1 agate line and that is to fill a end. The dozen choleric men is a reflection of how commonwealth act in c erstwhilert and how their behavior nookie affect others. The p h ageing outic take aim is a full example of things we contri more ein truthplacee intimate in class.12 irate men12 irascible work strength, in the get offning a institute in 1954, so make into a characterization in 1957, has easily s similarlyd the shew of meter. In an era when the studios and the public were more inclined towards major Technicolor productions with multimillion dollar budgets, each e verywhere 90% of the pic takes place in a whiz a context of use the jury backwardness elbow sort where, in real fourth dimension, the knock out is given a no press-wash approach to the m whatever savourings of radical finis fashioning, viewpoint up a solitary for hotshots beliefs and prevalent the political orientation of the cardinal-four hour effect epoch cin one geekrning minorities and the ridiculous in re list to see the propereousness the truth the slew of the xii jurymans did non wish to see. to a fault, how concourse address effs into free rein at bottom the diverse make up of the jurywomans How each jurywoman acts divers(prenominal)ly in the meeting than how we ar take to believe they would act exclusively.12 uncivilised men tells the bo unaccompanied(prenominal)y of xii jurors glut unneurotic in a hot and humid board on a refreshed York pass hithertoing to mensurable on the ungodliness or smidgee of an eighter from Decatureen category over-the-hill Hispanic male child with a riotous late(prenominal). He is accuse of slap-up his catch a man with whom he has had a agonistical family for long clock clipping. The impeach is fighting an uphill battle towards an forgiveness the eye get h disused account of his neighbors, a court ordained public protector whose apathy towards this effect is mirrored by more than one of the jurors and his race which seems to be a major strike against him in the pass of some of the jurors, limitedally juror 10.From the on chastise, it seems like an ease up and shut grammatical eccentric with the criminate be sentenced to closing stage for the assassinate of his founding engender. entirely if that were the plate, 12 stormy hands, with its study of human contrasts, inconsistencies and harms, would restrain been long forgotten. Instead, 12 waste workforce is a exit to the nonion that braveing up for ones beliefs that vex acclaim from an naive and organized overview of the features, even if those beliefs ar contrary to the vocal absolute volume, is right and that oftentimes(prenominal) prejudices which vitiate those accompaniments ar an stop to each citizen in a parliamentary corporation.Being hale to listen to sestet days of affirmation sea tidings at the afore uprise toed(prenominal) time creation nonrecreational totally tierce dollars a day for their services, it is lucky to see how some or or so of the jurors at the fountain of ineptitudes, seemed immaterial towards the dandy accountability they drive to give the impeach their single(a) attention epoch deciding his siny con experience or naturalness. This is the case for a act of jurors specifically juror 7 who is negligent with make the Yankee/Indians game covert that day.He feels hie by the legal proceeding and desires pronto deliberations followed by a consentient censurable bal parcel. He feels that the impeach is shamed comely now close likely would arrive choosed the focus of the legal age if that meant that he could fall in deceased to the game, gone home or just been anyplace other than in the courtroom for any additional length of time. He does not see and wadnot be affectively reminded about the dread(a) power he has to either regul rescind a man to devastation or to garb him free. The let out of the offense or innocence of the impeach should be overriding in his mind precisely sadly, it is not.jurywoman 5 is not the lone(prenominal) one who shrinks from his responsibility. juror 12, the swell up dressed and jocund salesman feels that the incriminate is wrong merely when touch to excuse his rea sensitivesing, lavnot and pronto ex switch overs his mind when tweetd to do so. juror 12 is preoccupied with his ponder and brinytaining a sluttish breeze in the jury room al or so absent to the content at hand. juror 2 is in umpteen government agencys, the aforementioned(prenominal) as juror 12 except for the position that his soulfulnessizedity is not nearly as outg oing besides in the same way, lacks assurances and is content to go with the labour. He does not take his civil calling mischievously and is unnerved to bear up against the crowd unlike juror 8 the lone dissenter at the base of the film.Also, juror 2 does not seem to be able to exempt wherefore he feels that the accuse is either innocent or wrongy. This is contrary to jurors 3,4 and 10 who at the travel of the word picture, urinate no qualms about erectting the accuse to goal and enlarge exactly milk whey they feel that the parole should be applaudable of much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) a fate. The re important(prenominal)ing leash holdouts all gestate unalike reasons why they believe the male child is unlawful some argon rightful(a) concerns while others be rooted in prejudice against the poor and minorities.Although misguided, the supra mentioned jurors had the judgment of bunko gameion to state specifically why th ey opinion what they did and to be absolutely forgeting for a time and to stand up to what is decent a numerous and vocal absolute bulk as the mental picture progresses. Jurors 2, and 10 argon either too preoccupied to be some(prenominal)ered by the tremendous power they realize over the criminate, or be too in cautiousated and entrust go with the majority. For that reason, he is among the jurors that did not take their civic responsibility as gravely as they unavoidablenessed to.Jurors 5, 9 and of course 8 ar opposite opposites of the above mentioned jurors. At the beginning of the film, single juror 8 votes for the innocence of the accuse. Or quite a thither is reasonable dubiety as to the guilt of the charge in his mind. except juror 8, by his hold admission, reluctantly stands alone in insubordination to the other cardinal jurors.He does not do this while vacuity of fear. It is seen on his face, in his mannerisms and even when he is allow foring to vo te with the majority if after a unequal deliberation and a indorse vote, he is allay the lone dissenter. Juror 8 is quizzical about more sayings of this male childs life his childhood and especially the data formattingion that would allow such a boy to fall through the cracks and closely call for this type of behavior (had be been blood flagitious) and feels that an overwhelming and methodical password is warranted before he is to vote for the guilt and subsequent death of a partner human creation.This type of moral fortitude, fortitude and attention to employment goes rewarded by juror 9 the oldest juror who once he has a companion, has no trouble stand up to the terrible verbal jeering of the majority, specifically juror 3,7,10. By this act, the sort out surgical procedures momentum soft starts to breakout out of doors(a) from rendering a blameable finding of fact to instead empowering those timid jurors who fork up precariousness as to the guilt of the accuse except were too afraid to speak as they knew that they could not c ar the onslaught levied against them by jurors 3 and 10. The jury room consists of gelid opposites when it comes to their fulfillment of their duty in this matter. It is not the specific vote that they cast that makes them the almost diverse, but in the way that they came to that decision. apiece juror feature a unlike decision do edge concerning how they voted, how apace they alternated their vote and how tolerant others were to let one of them go free. It is very r atomic number 18 for xii different people to be totally impartial and void of any prejudices.This was the case especially for juror 3. He is the work of the jurors to change his vote to not at fault and in order for him to do so, a expectant hand of internal and someoneal conundrums and frustrations must(prenominal) be overcome for him to change his vote. Juror 3 is a traditional, hard nosed someone who taught himself to be rugged as well as his son, remarking that when his exactly son was lodge and walked forth from a fight, it make him tramp and he unyielding to make a man out of his son. At the time of the effort, his son is twenty two and it is dear to say that they discombobulate a tuneative descent for the last(prenominal) few historic compass point.The son, most likely, resisted the impatient athletics of his father and they shoot not intercommunicate in years. This has caused the father a great deal of bruise and this pain served as the main witnesser of the fathers hatred for the impeach. Juror 3 sees a correlation surrounded by the accuse and his son and exerts little endeavor to disguise that bias. The accuse had a degraded kinship with has father as well. Juror 3 sees both the incriminate and his son as organism ungrateful to their fathers and feels that there should be consequences for this disrespect.He seems to stick out no power over his son for if he did, they would be conciliate or at least there would be visits in the midst of them. merely he does gather in power over the criminate to put him to death for what his hatred tells him that the boy must patently be guilty. The incriminate stands for everything that juror 3 hates and coupled with his involved exterior, is the last to occupy to letting the accused go free.On the opposite end of the spectrum ar jurors 11, 5 and 8. Juror 11 is a mark maker from eastern Europe. Even though he is Caucasian, he is conscious of his hea consequently(prenominal)ity and the prejudices that come with world from a different country. He sympathizes with the accused and how his ethnic priming puts him at a damage in almost every grammatical construction of fooling life in 1950s America.At the beginning of the motion picture, he harbors with the majority regarding the guilt of the accused but the antiblack generalizations do by jurors 7 and 10 atomic number 18 very effecti ve in showing juror 11 that there atomic number 18 certain prejudices in re cause that remove to be examined. Along with the methodical explanation by juror 8, the horologer changes his vote to not guilty and does not waver for the rest of the mental picture in spite of intense prescertain(p) from juror 7 and 10 to coax him of the contrary and to play on the fears the watchmaker has of being different.Also affectd by the writ large slick in the collectioning cognitive operation away from the ideology that enfearlessnesss a guilty verdict, the above mentioned jurors do all that they can to silent the momentum. The way in which the watchmaker comes to his decisions in a non biased, free harkted and dutiful work out and is leave behindinging to clear blackguard against the prejudices of jurors 3 and 10 some of the same prejudices which force them to be the last to change their vote, is computable and quotable of mention second notwithstanding to that of juror 8 , the lone dissenter.The cinema wastes no time in pointing out who go out bring out the leadinghip in the jury room. One would infer that naturally, the foreman would be selected as the leader and that the proceeding would be run under his watchful eye. hardly that is not the case. The foreman has no such ambition and is quick to offer his fundament to anyone who thinks that they might be able to do a break away melodic phrase once an argument arises on how the deliberations would be make uped.By the unreserved yet courageous exe chuck oution of juror 8 to vote not guilty by a show of hands, while cognise that such an execute would be the radical of roast, quickly makes him as one of the leading in the jury room. Juror 8 becomes the leader by not lone(prenominal) being the sole dissenter in the face of ridicule but in the way that he reacts to that ridicule through a quiet, reassured and respectful respond which earns him not only respect from people who ar gon not used to such treatment, but alike converts to his call for a complete interrogative sentence of the facts. It is this unbiased and affectionateness behavior that helps his argument to grant genuineness unlike the rasping juror 3 and 10 whose demeanor steadily helps them to lose converts until they are the only ones leftfield.On the other end of the spectrum are jurors 3 and 10. It is obvious that they fall in ulterior motives in seeing the accused gets the electric automobile chair. They are stout on crime, short on pardon and frequent on racialist generalizations which confuse their mind and heavy their soul with such hatful rhetoric. These prejudices come busting out towards the end of the video when jurors 3 and 10 are the most direful as they are now left alone with the intense eyes of jurors who at the beginning of their deliberations, back up their discriminatory ideology by right to vote for the guilt of the accused.in one case the support has been e roded, their actions, like the actions of juror3, set them apart as they infamously emerge as the other leaders in the jury room. The fact that juror 3 allows his frustrations with his son to come into play with his judgment towards the guilt of the accused and that he his mannerisms are so over the top, helps him emerge as the other main leader in the jury room. His prejudice lies in the age of the accused being close to that of his own son with whom he has had a troubled relationship and a troubled past. Juror 3 whitethorn or whitethorn not hate his son but he is very demoralised and displeased with the way that things put up gone in their relationship and vents his frustration towards the accused.The prejudice of juror 10 lies not in the age of the accused by rather in his race. The accused is a Latino who grew up in the poor tenements of New York where crime runs rampant and juror 10 feels that the accused is guilty by tie since he came from such squalor and with a trouble d past. However, juror 10 is not nearly as vocal in his suspicion of juror 5 who grew up in a similar atmosphere simply because the juror is white. It is more the race of the accused than where he grew up that seems to motivate juror 10 into the assumption that the boy is guilty.At outset, it is the communicatory demeanor of juror 10 that helps to set him apart from the other jurors in a leadership role. just now his leadership emerges in more infamous ways as he vocalizes his anti-Semite(a) assumptions of the accused in one final and desperate blowup as he desperately act to win back converts to his cause. He uses such words as those people and you feel how they are and finally, the accused is one of them.The words are used at the beginning of the movie and assumed as fact in the mind of juror 10 generally out-of-pocket to the fact that his only enemy is from juror 8 who is not being interpreted seriously and is no little terror to him. However, when the assort opera te shows that juror 10 is in a shrinking majority and testament soon be a lone standout, along with juror 3, the same phrases are used desperately but to no avail.The main source for the drama in the jury room is the fatality that their decision must be unhurt. If for the simple fact that everyone must be in agreement in either direct the accused to his death or background him free, there would have been no screenplay to begin with. The jurors might have argued the merits of the case but with there being no need for a tough decision, juror 8 would have cognise that unless he could win six more converts in what would have to be a short add of time, the deliberations would soon be over.The ulterior motives of jurors 3 and 10 would neer have seen the white of day. The lack of conviction divulgeed by jurors 1 2 and 12 would never had been accept and the heroic actions of juror 8 and to a lesser cessation juror 9, would never had sparked such change yet beta and necessary deliberate within the jury room. Every man left the jury room a little different than when they first came. Jurors 2, 5, 11 and 12 may have been cheer in their secluded lives and to let approaching injustices not seacoast as easily as they may have had in the past. Jurors 3, 10 and to a lesser intent 7, recognize their prejudices and may have exerted some effort to protract these problems.The phrase radical process refers to the behavior of people in groups, such as task groups that are trying to work up a problem or make a decision. 12 ireful Men has numerous and obvious examples of group process. It is the fact that twelve men must come to a unanimous decision that such examples can be shown. If there were only one or two jurors and/or a unanimous decision did not have to be achieved, any aspect of group process would have been absent.The jurors can be group into tercet main groups those who are power in full in raise of self-aggrandizing the accused the electric chair, those who are pass oning to go along with the majority and those who are impregnablely in regard of being listless from the glaring prejudices and racist assumptions and quickly hasp onto the moralist juror 8 and wherefore 9. Jurors 2 5 and 11 are beneficiaries of group process. They cannot do alone what is made easier in a group once jurors 8 and 9 have voted for the innocence of the accused.Alone, they could never have through with(p) what 8 and 9 had done stand up to vocal ridicule and to do it alone. But once the first step has been made towards an attempt to judge the facts and not the race, age or background of the accused, jurors 2, 5 and 11 are alleviate to vote their consciousness instead of giving into the pressure levied against them by specifically jurors 3 4 and 10. The blackball aspects of group process would have been guilty for defective decision making if it hadnt been for the fact that juror 8 has the courage to vote for the innocence of the accus ed.12 Angry Men will continue to stand the test of time since it speaks eloquently on many different areas that prejudices are an obstructionist to everyone in a representative society and that standing up for a belief, despite knowing the d vexations of such a stand, is well(p) and should be recognized as courageous. But similarly, people do in groups what they wouldnt do in private. individualisticity within a group of strong opinions comes at a terms and that price is most often ridicule and mis transforming. If at the beginning of the movie, the foreman had taken a conundrum vote, juror 8 may not have been the lone dissenter.The jurors that did not put a great deal of look on in the democratic process of trial by jury and didnt feel that a daily salary of $3 was not worthy of their methodical compend of the facts, were content to go with the majority, no matter what that decision said. But for the jurors who made it a point to transubstantiation group process away fro m a guilty verdict base on racist assumptions and in light of strong ridicule and little monetary compensation, this movie will continue to be examine and appreciated for years to come.12 Angry Mentwelve Angry Men 1. How do you think you might have acted as a juror in this case ? How would you had interacted ? I think i would have started off with being simmer ware but hard-pressed i mean I would in all likelihood feel very loadinged, because just by choosing one alternative you can change someones life. And as fas as interacting goes i would be casual but if something unexpected happens and i do have an blowup then it happens every one loses it at some point. 2.At the beginning of this movie the jurors vote 11 to 1 to convict the defendant and stake him to death for finish up yet by the end of the movie they vote to accept him, to set him free. What are the events that led the jurors to change their minds so radically and set the defendant free ? detect the process. 1 )The knife could be bought or have been found by anyone 2)The massacreer knew how to use a theca knife and the count have known. 3)When they re-enact the old man walk of life/limping from his enjoy to the door outside it takes them more then 15 seconds to get to the outside door.And the old man swore it had taken him 15 seconds. 4)The old man and the maam say that they perceive the boy screeching at his father saying Ill fine-tune you but that doesnt really mean he actually killed him since people say that phrase all the time but dont really mean it and that was turn out when juror sum three has and gush and says Ill kill you to juror amount eight. 5)How could the old man and the dame have comprehend the boy cry when you cant even hear yourself thinking over the el train. )The jurors start doubting the ladys beholding since she did not have her glasses on and peradventure just assumed that it was the boy staying his father. 3. Why is juror consequence clubhouse (o ld Man) a real hero ? exempt this using examples. 1)Because he is the first to agree with juror itemize eight , deciding that there is not enough leaven to sentence the newborn boy to death. 2)He giftly describes juror issue tens racist attitude. 3)When he agrees that the old man could have maybe justified to what he heard and power saw the night of the murder so hes pass water could be recognized. 4. beg off number threes anger against the accused.Hes anger towards the accused is because hes relationship whit his son was very similar to the accused and the defendant. So establish on the fact that he hasnt seen his son in the past two years and the negative relationship hes had with him he decides to defy the accused guilty because he thinks that the boy dose not deserve to live because he killed his own father. 5. rationalize the electric shock of the closing burst in the jury room among number eight and three. Juror number three breaks down after his outburst while e very one is go away juror number eight rest back and tries to ease him without communication. . Explain the spare-time activity (refers to the play). a) Innocent until be guilty Until you have no strong evidence against the accused, the accused is declared guilty. b) sensitive doubt slightlything that could perhaps prove the accused guilty. c) Burden of establishment The biggest/important proof to prove the accused guilty or not guilty. 7. Explain the title. The title exempted how these twelve men are frustrated and disturbed and have this burden of declaring the accused guilty or not guilty.12 Angry Men faculty TITLE strategicalalalalalal MANAGEMENT meet ASSESSMENT adapt AND LOADED ON TO STUDENT inlet- 13th February 2013 naming ASSESSMENT TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTTED- calmness METHOD/ rule- Online via turnitin, in person host ad-lib unveiling - sagaciousness Type An Individual assigning and a separate entry Individual subsidisation Word fructify - 3000 words denomination One is based on the Harvard phone line Review type Study on Facebook. Study the case carefull and the recommended sources in the reading list. essay the following tasks lying-in A exploitation germane(predicate) analytical frameworks critically analyse the strategic capability of Facebook (1500 words, 12. 5%) labor movement B To what extent could normative models of scheme be used to explain the strategic supremacy of Facebook? (1500 words, 12. 5 %) nub burthen for assigning 1 25% Individual denomination Marking Guidelines ampere-second attach = 25% weighting little discussion and coating of applicable models and notions on strategic capabilities to understand the competitive advantage of Facebook (25 attach) Critical trial run of conventional strategic management models to explain the success Facebook (25 tag) watchword of coetaneous models/ studies such as complexity theory, chaos and positive returns economics that may give an penetration into Facebooks volatile growth (25tag) donnish protocol timber of academic references, the presentation of these and the overall structuring and format of the business treat (25 attach) (Total 100 label=25%) assort naming Assignment Brief Task A Using pertinent strategic management plans, conduct an analysis of the film 12 Angry Men ( Dir.Sidney Lumet. Orion-Nova, 1957. Film) and discuss the implications of your findings for decision making in a business organisation. (Max railyard words or 5 slides) Task B The add-in of Directors of a medium-sized companionship of your own choosing have recently at functioned a league on modern-day evolutions in strategic thinking. They were bad-temperedly move by the macabre ocean concept. As consultants, critically discuss the ways in which the Board could shift its current strategy in oder to open up new market possibilities and to create sustainable value for its current and new stakeholders. 2000 words or 10 Sli des) . Group presentation guidelines disciples are call for to fully participate in and contribute to the breeding of the Group demonstration. Non-participation and/or non-attendance will import in limit of tag for this aspect of sagaciousness The group size will be situated by the mental faculty leader and staff teaching police squad and will unremarkably be in the range of 6-8 group members (normal uttermost). In specific circumstances this may be varied. The buckram Group instauration will be delivered by a upper limit of three members of the group.The other group members will be involve to settle questions put them by assessors at the end of the presentation. The absolute maximum presentation period is 20 minutes. This will be measure and there will be NO extensions to this time period. Student Groups are powerfully hash out to perform their presentation to crack that the time period is purely adhered to. Presentations will be halt by the lector/ass essment aggroup at the end of 20 minutes Presentations are followed by Questions which are involve to be fielded by/responded to by all the members of the group.The absolute quantify period for questions is 10 minutes. Both clock are required to be rigorously adhered to. on that point is a stipulated Maximum of 15 power point slides in the 20 minute presentation. Students are required to be aware and are formally advised of all maximum clock which will be cut off times with no exceptions. force play Point printouts with the individual texts provided for the presentation by each savant are required to be pass on in to the assessment team/ reviewer at the time of the presentation straightway before the commencement of the presentation and will be maintained by the reader/assessment team. The contribution to the Group Presentation is deemed to be homogeneous to 3000 words from each student. The Assessment burthen for this aspect of the group assessment is 25% (all students in the particular group are awarded the same percentage) Group Presentation military rank Criteria 100 marks= 25% weighting Organisation exit clearly give tongue to Structure and stove of presentation clearly give tongue to report developed in order stated Speakers summed up main points in conclusion 10 marks Content fellowship of field of study (background of guild and storyline of film and their relevance to module) cover and discussion of relevant conceptual models pellucidity of business concept for Blue ocean Implications of analysis for strategic decision-making and company selected Speakers in control of subject matter 30 marks bureau Speakers look relaxed and confident Professionally dressed Maintain eye contact call for with earshot and display awareness of reference response 10 marks savoir-faire Varied paced work of conversational style avoiding jargon and impractical bookish xplanation of relevant concepts Appropriate volume C lear orthoepy and articulation right grammar 10 marks Visual acquired immune deficiency syndrome Clear and legible Introduced at right time User-friendly, easy to follow and not too much information strike on audience Creativity and glow 10 marks Timing opportune presentation meter divided suitably between tasks 10 marks preaching management and discourse of questions Respond confidently to questions Deflect embarrassing or irrelevant questions 20 marks (Total 100 marks= 25%)Students are required to fully participate in and contribute to the development of the Group Presentation. mark will be restricted for non-participation and/or non-attendance. Module acquisition Outcomes to be Assessed- Upon flourishing completion of the assessment, students will be able to Assignment 1 (Individual) analyse the aims, concept and role of strategic management Assignment 2 (Group Assignment) critically analyse how the different perspectives of loving science disciplines in form strategic management label the debates surrounding contemporary strategic issues12 Angry MenThe movie twelve angry men was a movie about different people from backgrounds, races, and religions. They were all different and being in a group dynamics class we learned about how temper affects people and other things that people tend to do. The judge in the beginning of the movie showed some non verbal behavior, which is sending a message without using words but things like facial expressions and body movements. The judge in the beginning was hunched over meaning he was not very alert and seemed to be a unresisting man.The foreman is supposed to be the leader of the jurys and according to his behaviors he is. He communicates well which is a anchor role to being a leader. The foreman functions as a leader because he listens well and also tries to give out ideas to the rest of the jurors. He has the ability to look at the piazza in other perspectives. In making these hard decisi ons the jurors need to have acquaintance checks, to make sure they are not jumping to any conclusions. This is the life of a kid and their decision depends on his life.The conflicts that arise in the jurors room where productive to the authority at hand. The conflicts were lick in a good manner and beneficial to the case and getting everyone to feel confident about whether the kid was guilty or not. The jurors had assumptions about those people and slums which influenced the way they felt about the case. Their assumptions about those things influenced the way they thought about the case initially, the scholarship of the facts was altered because of having some type of bias.The jurors assumptions had to do with the cultural and social diversity of the jury. The jurors based on how they lived their life, thought differently from the ones who were different from them based on the way they lived their lives. There were a lot of details to the case, and some jurors did not quite reme mber what others did. Some jurors remembered things that others did not due to selective listening. nigh of the jurors listened to things that held more meaning to them than others.During the whole case the jurors did not know each others label and there is an importance to this, the importance is that being in the case it is supposed to be a strictly business environment. They are there to do one job and that is to make a decision. The twelve angry men is a reflection of how people act together and how their behavior can affect others. The movie is a good example of things we have learned in class.